Showing posts with label pig health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pig health. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 12, 2016

IPVS Congress releases preliminary program

The preliminary program for the 24th International Pig Veterinary Society (IPVS) Congress and 8th European Symposium of Porcine Health Management (ESPHM) has been released. The jointly-held event will take place June 7-10 in Dublin, Ireland.
The event will include a number of presentations by leading industry keynote speakers and roundtable discussions.
Topics to be discussed include:
  • Bacteriology and bacterial diseases
  • Herd health management
  • Immunology and vaccination
  • Parasitology and parasitic diseases
  • Reproduction
  • Veterinary public health and food safety
  • Virology and viral diseases
  • Welfare and nutrition
Scheduled speakers include:
  • Gary Althouse DVM, MS, PhD, Dipl. ACT, Chairman, Department of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center
  • Sandra Edwards, Professor, UK Agricultural Development and Advisory Service
  • David Francis, Emeritus professor,South Dakota State University
  • Dr. Peter Geldhof, Professor, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Ghent University
  • Dr. Bruno Goddeeris, Chairman of the Scientific Council, VAR-CODA-CERVA (Centre for Veterinary and Agrochemical Research) of Belgium
  • Dr. Carl Andreas Groentvedt DVM, Dipl. ECPHM, Swine health expert and researcher, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo
  • Prof. Anja Joachim, Professor, Institute of Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
  • Dr. Yuzo Koketsu, Professor, School of Agriculture Meiji University, Japan
  • Dr. Andrea Luppi, Brescia and Reggio Emilia Laboratory (IZSLER)
  • Dr. John Mabry, Director, Iowa Pork Industry Center, ISU
  • Fernando A. Osorio DVM, PhD DACVM, Professor, Nebraska Center for Virology and School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
  • Gerald Reiner, Professor, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Clinic for Swine, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
  • Dr. Nicolas Rose DVM, PhD, Director, Swine Epidemiology and Welfare research unit
  • Prof. Jonathan Rushton, President, International Society for Economics and Social Science of Animal Health
  • Peter Stevenson, author of comprehensive legal analyses of EU legislation on farm animals and of the impact of the WTO rules on animal welfare and lead author of the recent study by the FAO reviewing animal welfare legislation in the beef, pork and poultry industries

Abstracts being accepted until January 8

The deadline to submit abstracts for the IPVS Congress and ESPHM is January 8, 2016. This is an opportunity for people in the swine health field to advance their careers, advance their departments and make industry connections.
Potential abstract topics include:
  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)
  • Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDv)
  • Classical swine fever or African swine fever
  • Viral and viral diseases
  • Porcine circovirus type 2 (PVC2)
  • Swine influenza virus (SIV)
  • Herd health management and economy
  • Welfare and nutrition
  • Reproduction
  • Lawsonia
  • Brachyspira
  • Salmonella
  • H. Parasuis
  • S.suis
  • Parasitic diseases
  • Vaccinology and immunology
  • Antimicrobial
  • Mycoplasma
  • Actinobacillus
  • Clostridia
  • E Coli
  • Bacteriology and bacterial diseases
  • Veterinary public health (food safety)
  • Miscellaneous
Abstracts can be submitted online.

Monday, January 11, 2016

Federal order on swine enteric coronavirus updated

The USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) on January 4 issued an updated federal order related to swine enteric coronavirus diseases (SECD), including porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) virus and swine delta coronavirus. The order is effective immediately.
The updated order will do several things, including changing how emergency funding APHIS received in 2014 will be used. APHIS has reprioritized its needs going forward and will focus all remaining SECD funds towards diagnostic testing. With this modification, the funds should last long enough to cover diagnostic testing through this winter season.
The revised federal order will also eliminate the herd plan requirement, as well as reimbursement to veterinarians for completing those plans. And, it will also eliminate reimbursement for biosecurity actions, like truck washing.
In response to a large number of SECD cases that were causing significant hardship for the U.S. swine industry, APHIS issued a federal order in June 2014 making SECD a reportable disease. At the same time, USDA made funds available to cover specific costs associated with the disease. SECD remains a reportable disease, which means that producers, veterinarians, and diagnostic laboratories are required to report all cases of SECD to USDA or state animal health officials. The reporting criteria are unchanged in the updated federal order.
USDA is receiving more accurate and timely information about SECD affected herds and their locations, which allows animal health officials to better understand how the disease spreads and what measures are most effective in containing it. The outbreak peaked between January and March 2015. In the last 5 months, the weekly average of new confirmed positive premises has dropped 90 percent when compared to the average number of weekly cases during the peak of the outbreak.  

Friday, January 8, 2016

Engineering pigs to beat virus

A research team at the Roslin Institute is using advanced genetic techniques to engineer pigs that are more resilient to deadly virus infections. The study at the University of Edinburgh is aimed at assessing whether changing the pigs’ genetic code at a precise point in their DNA affects their susceptibility to African Swine Fever. The next step will be to test how altering the pigs’ genes affects transmission of the virus and whether the animals fare better after infection than standard farmed pigs.
The animals have been created using an advanced genetic technique called “gene editing” to modify individual letters of the pigs’ genetic code. The change is designed to dampen the immune system’s overreaction to the virus, which is responsible for the devastating effects of the disease.
African Swine Fever is spread by ticks. When standard farmed pigs are infected, they become ill very quickly and die. In contrast, warthogs and bush pigs show no disease symptoms when infected. One of the pig genes associated with African Swine Fever Virus infection is called RELA. The role of this gene is to activate the immune response.
Warthogs and bush pigs carry a different version (or allele) of the RELA gene to that found in domestic pigs. This difference may make them resilient to African Swine Fever. The gene differs from that carried by domestic pigs that you would find on a farm by only a few letters of the genetic code. However, this may have a huge impact on the outcome of infection.
Roslin scientists have produced pigs which have a single letter of their genetic code altered. These animals produce a shorter version of RELA, which lacks a domain involved in the immune response. The team had created a separate group of pigs that have changes at several sites in their RELA gene, to make it the identical to the version that is found in the warthog.
All of the changes that have been introduced could have occurred spontaneously in nature. Researchers hope that the genetic changes will make the animals more resilient to infection with African Swine Fever Virus, but they still need to test this in controlled trials.
There has never been an outbreak of African Swine Fever in the UK, yet the virus has recently started spreading throughout Eastern Europe. There are fears that it could reach British farms.
The team plans to use the same gene-editing techniques to produce cattle, chickens and sheep that are resistant to infections; however, this research is at a much earlier stage.
Professor Bruce Whitelaw, head of Developmental Biology at the University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute, said, “We have used a gene-editing technique to change individual letters in the pigs’ genetic code, to speed up a process that occurs spontaneously in nature.
“Our goal is to improve the welfare of farmed pigs around the world, making them healthier and more productive for farmers.”

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Guide to antibiotic usage on pig farms

A review containing guidance to help pig producers cut their use of antimicrobials was published recently. It was produced jointly by the Pig Health and Welfare Council (PHWC) Antimicrobial Sub-group and the Pig Veterinary Society.
John FitzGerald, Sub-group chairman, said, “The PHWC supports the responsible use of antibiotics. This means minimizing the need to use antibiotics by managing the farm to reduce the risk of disease and using them properly to maintain animal health and welfare.
“We are delighted to launch this guidance, which will help vets and farmers to review their antibiotic use regularly and to consider ways in which this could be optimized without harming the pigs.”
Grace Webster, PVS representative on the Sub-Group, said, “We acknowledge that many vets and farmers are already applying these best practice guidelines in their review of antibiotic usage. This is an integral part of their ongoing efforts to use antibiotics ‘as little as possible and as much as necessary’ to safeguard the health and welfare of the pigs under their care and encourage all of our members to consider whether they can improve their current approach.”
To review the report, click here. For general information about the PHWC follow this link.

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

European Commission approves MSD’s Procilis PCV ID

The European Commission has approved MSD Animal Health’s Porcilis PCV ID, an intradermal vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) that is administered with the needle-free IDAL vaccine delivery system.
With this addition to the company’s line of intradermal vaccines, swine producers will now have access to intradermal needle-free protection against PCV2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyo) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSv), the three major swine diseases affecting pig operations worldwide.
“The skin is a natural defense barrier, containing many essential immune cells and thus making it a very suitable and effective route of vaccine administration,” explains Dr. Ruud Segers, MSD Animal Health Research & Development. “We are focusing our R&D efforts on the development of vaccines that would benefit from being administered intradermally.”
“Animal well-being is important to us. Needle-free vaccination is not only more convenient for producers, but is also less invasive for the animals and prevents accidental spread of disease caused by reusing needles. In addition, the risk of breaking needles is also eliminated,” said Narciso Bento, head of the Global Swine Business Unit. “We are pleased to introduce the first intradermal vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2, and to expand our line of swine vaccines that can be conveniently administered with the IDAL needle-free device.”
PorcilisPCV ID protects piglets starting two weeks after vaccination and offers 23 weeks of protection, the longest duration of immunity of any porcine circovirus vaccine in the EU market. The vaccine is approved for concurrent use with MSD Animal Health’s PorcilisM Hyo ID ONCE, which protects piglets against M. hyo infections. Because concurrent infection with PCV2 and M. hyo is present in the vast majority of swine operations worldwide and together they are responsible for severe respiratory disease and production losses, vaccination against both pathogens/diseases is recommended to minimize economic losses.
Results from field studies demonstrate that vaccinating piglets intradermally with Porcilis PCV ID results in uninterrupted growth during the nursery period, and improve the daily weight gain and mortality associated with PCV2 infection during the fattening period. When applied concurrently with Porcilis M Hyo ID ONCE, a further increase in ADWG as well as a reduction of M. hyo-like lung lesion scores at slaughter have been demonstrated.

Wednesday, October 21, 2015

Meta-analysis: weight determines ileal protein digestibility in pigs

A recent meta-analysis, by Drs. J. A. Almeida and Hans H. Stein from the University of Illinois and Dr. Carsten Pedersen from Hamlet Protein, has resulted in the abstract “Effect of weight on standardized ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids in pigs.” In short, the abstract highlights that ileal digestibility of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA) in piglets (<20kg) is lower than in growing (20 to 50kg) and finishing (50 to 110kg) pigs. Results also indicated that differences among weight groups of pigs most likely are feedstuff specific.
As an example, the digestibility of CP and AA in HP 300 has been determined only in piglets, whereas digestibility values for CP and AA in de-hulled soybean meal (48% CP) have been generated from all weight groups of pigs. The average standardized ileal digestibility (SID) for CP in HP 300 is 89.5%, whereas the SID for CP in soybean meal is 85.5%. However, the average SID for CP in SBM if determined in piglets (<20kg) is only 81.0%. Therefore, it may be concluded that using values across all weight categories of pigs may not always provide a true picture of the differences in SID of CP and AA among feed ingredients fed to piglets.
The practical implication of this report is that most current formulation practices using digestibility values based on growing and finishing pigs inherently over-estimate the true digestibility of the raw materials for the weaned piglet. It is unknown at this time if there is a consistent age related change across raw materials. If the digestibility change is not consistent, the typical formulation approach using growing and finishing pig digestibility values will rank raw materials incorrectly for the young pig.
Dr. Stein says, “We have tried to summarize all of our data on soy products in pig feed by combining data from all peer-reviewed publications on the nutritional value of soy products for pigs. This has resulted in a complete overview of the nutritional values of all soy products. We have also divided the results by pig weight at the time of the trials and we conclude that smaller pigs have a lower digestibility of amino acids than older pigs.”
Dr. Pedersen adds, “Our findings correspond to a newly published study from University of Alberta, Canada. “Amino acid digestibility determined in growing-finishing pigs may not be applicable for weaned piglets” (Dr. Soenke Moehn, 2015).
The study compared SID of CP and AA in soybean meal and canola meal in piglets (8.1kg) and growing-finishing pigs (59.1kg). Dr. Moehn said, “The large differences, and inconsistency across feedstuffs, indicate that the SID of AA should be directly determined in piglets instead of being extrapolated from growing or finishing pigs.”
The paper by Drs. J. A. Almeida, Hans H. Stein and Carsten Pedersen was first presented at the Digestive Physiology of Pigs meeting in Kliczkow, Poland, in May 2015.

Monday, October 19, 2015

Boycott on man-made dwarfism in pigs

Britain’s National Pig Association (NPA) has added its voice to the chorus of criticism of a Chinese firm’s plans to produce gene-edited micro-pigs and sell them for around GBP1,000 (US$1,534).

NPA is urging showbiz personalities in Britain to set an example of good animal welfare by boycotting the market in micro-pigs, regardless of whether these so-called “tea-cup” pigs have been created by genetic engineering or selective breeding.
“The current trend for keeping micro-pigs as fashion accessories could be perpetuating serious animal welfare problems,” said Dr. Crayford. “Some miniature pig lines were originally developed for medical research and can carry genetic mutations responsible for deformities linked to animal dwarfism, such as deformed skulls and weak limbs.” 
Other lines of micro-pig have been developed by successively breeding from litter runts, which can lead to expensive veterinary bills caused by genetic weaknesses and susceptibilities, including walking difficulties and obesity.
Continued breeding of micro-pigs may compromise animal welfare and should not be encouraged, says NPA. Pigs generally do not make good house pets because they are programmed to root and chew, so they can be destructive if kept in a house or small town garden. 
A further problem for dilettante pig-keepers is ensuring the animals are fed properly, says NPA chairman Richard Lister, a North Yorkshire professional pig producer. “Because of the risk of spreading disease, it is illegal to feed pigs raw or cooked catering waste, and that includes all waste from household kitchens — and the penalty is a fine or prison sentence of up to two years.” 
Micro-pigs pose a risk to the nation’s food supply, NPA contends, as they can catch and spread diseases such as foot-and-mouth but they are harder to trace as some owners are not be aware of the legal requirement to register them.
Another risk for unsuspecting buyers is that they may be sold as what appears to be a micro-pig but is in fact just a small pig, which in time will grow to 150-200 kilos.

Monday, September 28, 2015

Innovative test designed to detect swine flu virus subtypes

Pork producers now have access to a comprehensive diagnostic kit designed to test production animals for swine influenza virus (SIV) subtypes with the launch of the VetMAX™-Gold SIV Subtyping Kit, the industry’s only USDA-approved, real-time PCR test of its kind.

Swine have a unique role in the transmission of influenza viruses among species. They are the only animal raised in abundance that can both be infected by and transmit virus to other pigs. When housed in close contact, the pig can serve as a biological mixing vessel, where influenza genes from any susceptible species can combine and undergo re-assortment within the animal to emerge as a new subtype. The complexity of swine influenza diagnostics requires a robust molecular subtyping solution for reliable differentiation of the swine H and N subtypes, providing information used to monitor and control the disease.

When used in combination with MagMAX™ Pathogen RNA/DNA Kit and VetMAX-Gold SIV Detection Kit, the VetMAX-Gold SIV Subtyping Kit provides veterinary diagnostic laboratories with a complete screening and subtyping solution that is both rapid and cost-effective. The SIV Detection Kit provides a detection rate of more than 95 percent in positive samples, and can return results in less than a day.

Counted among the top three respiratory health challenges in production animals, SIV is highly contagious, causing fever, lethargy and significant weight loss, resulting in economic loss to producers. Hog production companies have previously estimated the cost of the disease to range from $3.231 to $10.312 per pig as a result of reduced performance or mortality.

Thermo Fisher now offers five USDA-licensed molecular diagnostic tests for customers, more than any other company in the animal health space. Sold under the VetMAX™-Gold name, they include: BVDV PI Detection Kit, SIV Detection Kit, SIV Subtyping Kit, Trich Detection Kit and the AIV Detection Kit.
1 Dykhuis Haden C., T. Painter, T. Fangman, and D. Holtkamp. Assessing production parameters and economic impact of swine influenza, PRRS and Mycoplasma hyopneimoniae on finishing pigs in a large production system. Proceedings 2012 AASV Annual Meeting. 75-76.
2 Donovan, T.S. Influenza isolate selection methodology for timely autogenous vaccine use. Proceedings 2008 Amer Assoc Swine Vet Conf. 557-561.

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

AB Neo and Bristol University research pig accelerator

Wednesday, July 8, 2015

Discussing oxidative stress with European pig producers

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Breaking new ground in oxidative stress and gut microflora in swine

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Using viruses to treat bacterial infections in pigs?

Friday, May 15, 2015

5 ways to keep your pigs from sizzling this summer

Friday, May 1, 2015

Danisco’s Enviva EO shown to resolve challenges in swine

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Canada pork producers commit funds for pig health collaboration

Friday, December 5, 2014

Danes want to stop feeding plasma to pigs

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

National Pork Board funds new swine health information center

Monday, November 24, 2014

Pork board may create National Swine Health Information Center

  • Andrea Gantz
    The National Pork Board will soon vote on a proposal to create a National Swine Health Information Center.
    From WATTAgNet:
    The National Pork Board will soon vote on a proposal to create a National Swine Health Information Center with funding from the Pork Checkoff. If realized the center would be used as a tool to implement industry preparedness for disease challenges that impact the swine industry. 
    The announcement about the proposal was made during the Iowa State University Swine Disease Conference by
    Harry Snelson, DVM, American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV), and Craig Rowles, DVM, Elite Pork, announced the proposed center during the Iowa State University Swine Disease Conference.
    Snelson and Rowles said that the center, if approved, would be funded over a five-year period by a $15 million to $20 million investment by the Pork Checkoff.
    “A board made up of representatives from the National Pork Board (NPB), National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) and AASV will have the responsibility for setting the executive direction of the Swine Health Information Center,” Rowles said. “AgConnect, part of the Institute for Infectious Animal Diseases at Texas A&M, will work with the new Center to put geospatial data with potential disease outbreaks.”
    Rowles said the center would be used as a tool to help implement swine industry preparedness, enhance and supplement non-regulatory disease response and improve swine health management.
    The center, according to Snelson, would focus on global production diseases and would establish a mechanism for evaluating disease implications and prioritizing threats.

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Fat and oil variability creates problems for pig feed formulations

Monday, October 20, 2014

Pig diseases can be monitored via oral fluids on cotton rope

  • Giving pigs cotton ropes to chew on could be a more cost-effective and stress-free way for pig producers to monitor their herds for diseases like porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus, according to a three-year research project.
    By taking oral fluid samples from the rope, pig producers and veterinarians can assess the health status of their animal in a non-invasive way, Lorna Dawson, a PhD. student involved in a research project sponsored by the British Pig Executive (BPEX).
    “By collecting oral fluid samples I could screen more animals than was physically possible when carrying out blood sampling,” Dawson told Farmers Weekly.
    Sample collection was performed by suspending a cotton rope over a pen for the pigs to chew, using methods that were initially established at Iowa State University.
    Deposited oral fluid samples were then checked for specific disease markers such as viral RNA and antibodies, allowing the early diagnosis of specific diseases at the subclinical or clinical stage.
    “This suggests that the use of oral fluid is potentially a feasible, low cost, non-invasive way to assess the disease status in pig populations,” said Dawson.
    Dawson added that this non-invasive way of testing is better from an animal welfare perspective.