- It urged the board to increase to at least $3 million the amount that could recovered over a five-year period using the most streamlined mechanism currently available for challenging freight rail rates — known as the three-benchmark method. Under this method, the board proposed to increase the recovery limit to $2 million, up from the current $1 million.
- It supported the board's proposal to eliminate the current $5 million limit that shippers potentially can recover using a second “simplified” agency mechanism for challenging unreasonable rail rates. But it urged the agency to delete a concurrent proposal that would undermine use of this method for challenging rates by imposing a new burden that would require shippers to calculate the full replacement cost of rail system facilities used to serve the shipper filing the rate complaint.
The National Grain and Feed Association
has called on the federal Surface Transportation Board to
improve its rules and policies to improve the ability of agricultural shippers
to challenge unreasonable rail freight rates.
In a statement submitted
to the agency, the association commended the board for proposing changes and
soliciting public comments on the current methods available to shippers to
challenge unreasonable rates. But the association also called for the board to
undertake a more comprehensive, in-depth review of its simplified standards for
rail rate regulation, with a goal of proposing further and more significant
modifications. The association said if the Surface Transportation Board finds
that its current methods for challenging unreasonable freight rates are
inadequate, the agency should ask Congress for additional statutory authority
“designed to provide genuinely simplified and expedited standards for resolving
rail rate disputes.”
In its statement, the National Grain and
Feed Association also commented on the following things:
No comments:
Post a Comment