Gestation stall ban rejected by Connecticut legislature

The Connecticut General Assembly has defeated legislation that would have banned the use of gestation stalls. America’s pork producers expressed gratitude for the Connecticut General Assembly’s fortitude in standing with local family farmers and supporting their use of a safe and humane form of housing pregnant sows.
The vast majority of the country’s independent hog farmers use gestation stalls to house pregnant sows because they allow for individualized care and eliminate aggression from other sows. The housing method is approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association and the American Association of Swine Veterinarians.
As Connecticut family farmers stood up for their right to farm, the legislation failed on multiple fronts, including in the legislature’s Environment Committee, which removed stall ban language from a bill that would create a livestock care board. Farmers across the state rallied for their right to farm, attending hearings and submitting comments. Animal-rights groups hired out-of-state volunteers to lobby the assembly.
“Wealthy animal-rights groups appear to have a bumpy road ahead of them after so many failed legislative attempts to criminalize farmers for using humane farming practices,” said Dr. Howard Hill, a veterinarian and pork producer from Cambridge, Iowa, who is president of the National Pork Producers Council. “The outlook for their future state-level crusades against local family farmers, thankfully, is grim.”
The defeat in Connecticut is just one in a series of state-level failures for animal-rights groups, which have pushed gestation stall bans in states with little agriculture production, spending exorbitant amounts of their donors’ contributions.
“The legislative power of animal-rights groups is waning as state after state has stood up in favor of local farmers,” said Hill. “These groups are introducing the same legislation in the same states and being served defeat after defeat.”